Author: Smead Capital Management

We at Smead Capital Management are in the camp of long-duration investors who believe we’ve entered an extended period of intermittent interest rate increases, a reversal from the 35-year era of intermittent declining rates we have experienced since 1981. The following chart shows that speculators have placed very heavy bets on rising interest rates in November. The placement of these heavy bets indicates that we could be close to the first temporary peak in the 10-year Treasury bond moving from the historically low rates around 1.5%. It looks to us like the first inning of a nine-inning game; the last game of this kind lasted 30 years.

As long-duration common stock pickers we seek to buy meritorious companies which fit our eight criteria for stock selection. However, as investors with a ten-year time frame and 36-years of observational experience in investing, we invoke Bernard Baruch who said, “The activity which made me the most money in common stocks was sitting on my hands.” For this reason, we have an interesting perch to watch the investors around us who are turning their portfolios over with regularity. How does an investor get a feel for shorter duration tops in the one-to-two year time range?

During our discussions with clients in October we were asked repeatedly what the outcome of the Presidential election would do to our investments. Regardless of the outcome, our answer was always the same. In our opinion, whoever was elected in 2016 was going to be the luckiest person to hold the seat since Ronald Reagan. Our belief comes from the emergence of the largest population group forming households like boomers did in the 1980’s.

As an observer of ten presidential election cycles while working in the investment business, we thought it would be a good thing to give the current stock market environment some historical context. Revenue growth stories in tech are making what some would call “maniacal new highs.” Perceived losers in the 2016 cycle, like healthcare, have been purged by the stock market. Betting sites and many of the polls have had Hillary Clinton running ahead (before the reopening of the FBI investigation) and favor among the S&P 500 sectors is seemingly representative of her perceived industry likes and dislikes. Could this discounting prior to the election be symptomatic of a contrary indicator?